Français
العربية
Português
አማርኛ
Kiswahili
Afrikaans
Español
हिन्दी
中文Feature prioritisation
Stop building for the loudest customer.
Make customers choose between features, and get a ranked roadmap where every item isn’t “very important”.
14-day free trial · Every research method on every plan
MaxDiff · Preference share
Illustrative
Slack integration
24%
HubSpot integration
21%
CSV import
12%
Team roles
11%
Audit log
10%
Custom fields
9%
Dark mode
7%
Mobile app
6%
The problem
Ask customers to rate features and everything scores 4 out of 5. Rating scales hide trade-offs, so roadmaps end up shaped by whoever shouts loudest: the biggest client, the latest sales call, the founder’s favourite idea.
How Survey Blaster solves it
Built in, with the report done for you.
MaxDiff (best–worst)
Respondents pick the most and least important item from small sets. The report gives best-minus-worst scores and preference shares that add up to 100%.
Ranking, constant sum and paired comparison
Rank items, split 100 points across them, or compare them head to head. Each comes with average-rank heat maps, allocation treemaps or win-rate matrices.
Randomised sets
Answer options and MaxDiff sets are randomised automatically to avoid order bias.
By segment
Cross-tab results by plan, persona or market to build a roadmap for the customers you want most.
Example
See it in practice.
Fictional example.
A B2B software startup asks 300 customers and trial users to trade off eight roadmap items. MaxDiff shows two integrations far ahead of the rest, so the team builds those next instead of spreading effort across four.
Which plan you need
Basic for one study of about 300 completed responses. Team for a product team sharing studies and running several a quarter.
Compare plansFAQ
Questions, answered
How many items can I test?
Keep it to 8–20 for most studies. More items need more respondents.
How many responses do I need?
About 300, and at least 200 per segment you compare (Sawtooth).